So you think you can trust your incident reporting system. Bet you can’t! 

You probably have an incident reporting system of some kind in place.
You might even be happy with it. But if your incident reporting
system doesn't include an incident investigation feature, it could
cost you!
The Example
Recently, a former Queensland
director was granted compensation for a psychological injury she
received as a result of two 'loud and vulgar' arguments with a
subordinate colleague in front of other staff and students in October
2008. In the second argument, the subordinate had to be physically
restrained. In response to the events, both employees were summarily
dismissed. The director filed complaints and claimed that the incident
had resulted in personal depression.
A court found that her
employer failed to investigate the incidents before it sacked her in
response to the events and were required to pay compensation,
stating that, 'The termination of Ms Page's employment was not
implemented in a reasonable way."
The Lesson
Investigate
before you act. Reporting this incident alone would not have been
enough for the company to avoid responsibility. In fact, had the
incident been investigated, they would likely have dealt with the
situation very differently.
An incident reporting system that
implements mandatory investigation before an incident can be closed
would likely have provided the additional information that the company
needed in order to make an informed decision on their course of
action. As it was, the decision to dismiss the director without any
form of compensation was made on third party observations alone.
The Problem
Australian
law requires every organisation to have an incident reporting system
in place. For many companies, and almost all small companies, this
consists of an incident report form and somewhere to store the
recorded information; it could be an Excel spreadsheet, it could be a
filing cabinet. The law doesn't ask for much more than this. The
investigation aspect of this requirement, while provided for on most
incident report forms, does not require action before the information
is stored. And that's the problem.
The Solution
If your
incident reporting system has in-built functionality that requires an
investigation and the subsequent report to be completed before
closing the incident, you can guarantee that you are provided with
the information you need to take corrective actions.
This is how your incident report system can actually work to improve workplace safety. And isn't that the point?
The Next Step
While
investigative actions can be mandated by simple organisational
policy, this provides no guarantee. However, there are a number of
incident reporting software solutions on the market today that provide
this feature. A simple Google search should help you find the
solutions you're looking for. Try the keywords, "OHS incident
reporting" or "injury reporting" and check out what's available.
The solutions are out there - and they could save you a lot of money!
Visit incidentreportt's profile page
If you enjoyed this article or found it useful, please share it with your friends on Facebook, Twitter or Google+
Tweet